Supreme Court News, India Legal News, Legal Updates, Indian Courts News, Law Firms News & More
Supreme Court News, India Legal News, Legal Updates, Indian Courts News, Law Firms News & More
S.R. Bommai Vs. Union of India Case Summary – Article 356 Explained Facts S.R. Bommai Vs. Union of India: In 1989, S.R. Bommai, a representative of the Janata Dal Government, served as Karnataka’s eleventh chief minister. Due to a lack of majority support, his administration was dissolved on April 21st, and under Article 356(1) of…
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy Judgement | Justice K.S. Puttaswamy Case Case Name: Justice K.S. Puttaswamy & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. (2018) Justice K.S. Puttaswamy Case is also famously known as “Right to Privacy Case”. Citation: [2018] 8 SCR 1 Court: Supreme Court of India, Constitutional Bench Date of Judgment: September 26, 2018 Bench: Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan Issues in…
Case Name: “Supreme Court AOR Association and Anr Vs. Union of India. Citation: {2015} 13 SCR 1COURT: Supreme Court Of India Facts of the Case: Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association Vs. Union of India The petition challenges the validity of the ninety-ninth Amendment to the Constitution Act, 2014, and the National Judicial Appointment Commission…
Official Assignee of Madras vs Mercantile Bank of India Case Brief 1935 Case No : (1935) 37 BOMLR 130 Court : Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (Appeal From Bombay High Court) Privy Council Bench : Lord Atkin, Lord Macmillan, Lord Wright, SIR John Wallis and SIR Lancelot Sanderson. Pronounced : 15 October, 1935 Appellant : Official Assignee Of Madras Respondent : The Mercantile Bank Of India Ltd Acts Involved: Abstract : This case, Official Assignee of Madras vs Mercantile Bank of India, deals with a dispute over ownership of certain groundnut consignments pledged by…
Mukri Gopalan Vs. Cheppilat Puthanpurayil Aboobacker Case Brief Citation : AIR 1995 SC 2272 Bench: S.B. Majmudar and Faizan Uddin Date of Decision: 2nd July 1995 Murli Gopalan Case Summary Introduction Mukri Gopalan Vs. Cheppilat Puthanpurayil Aboobacker is a landmark supreme court judgement that clarified whether an appellate authority under section 18 of the Kerela Rent Control Act operates as a persona deisgnata or as a court…
Syndicate Bank Vs. K Umesh Nayak Case Brief Court: Supreme Court of India Date of Judgement: 13/09/1994 Bench: P.B. Sawant, Kuldip Singh, S. Mohan, G.N. Ray, N.P. Singh Citation: AIR 1995 SC 319 FACTS OF THE CASE : Syndicate Bank Vs. K Umesh Nayak On April 10, 1989, the Indian Bank Association and the All India Bank Employees Unions signed a memorandum of settlement that was binding…
Saleem Bhai Vs. State Of Maharashtra Title Saleem Bhai and Ors v. State Of Maharashtra and Ors | Saleem Bhai Vs. State Of Maharashtra Bench Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, Arijit Pasayat Date of Judgment 17/12/2002 Citation AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 759 FACTS Saleem Bhai Vs. State Of Maharashtra ▪ Respondents filed lawsuits in 2002 as plaintiffs to contest particular rulings and decrees. According to Order VII Rule 11 of…
Case Brief : Novartis AG Vs. Union Of India & Others Facts Novartis AG Vs. UOI: A well-known pharmaceutical company, Novartis International (The Appellant), submitted a patent registration application for the medication “Glivec.” The cancer-treating medication “Imatinib mesylate” in its beta crystal form was used in the creation of this medication. Because of restrictions on…
CASE BRIEF Indian Bank vs. Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd, AIR 1998 SC 1952Citations :- AIR 1998 SUPREME COURT 1952Bench:- S.C. AGRAWAL. G.T. NANAVATIAppellant :- Indian bankRespondent :- Maharashtra state cooperative marketing federation Ltd FACTS – Indian Bank vs. Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd Bank of India vs. Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank, decided…
Case Brief – Shah Bano Verdict 1985 Facts Procedural History ISSUES ARGUMENTS For Husband (Appellant) For Wife (Respondent) JUDGEMENT OBSERVATION In Case Brief – Shah Bano Verdict 1985, Chief Justice Chandrachud observed : “A uniform civil code (UCC) will help the cause of national integration by removing disparate loyalties to law which have conflicting ideologies”…